50+ im Internet – lakecity50.com

Quantum AI Test: These payment methods are selectable!

Users click on the ready „Deposit“ button to make the payment. Immediately, all currencies available for deposit appear. Moving coins from a private crypto wallet or another crypto exchange is possible free of charge. The transfer only takes a few minutes.

These three different e-wallets are supported by Quantum AI crypto exchange:

• Exchange Wallet: one of the most popular wallets supported by Quantum AI Crypto Exchange.
• Margin wallet: can be used for margin trading
• Funding Wallet: used for funding funds
• Quantum AI Experience: Fees

In the Quantum AI test, it turned out that no fees are charged for opening an account. Likewise, the deposit is free of charge. The company has published an overview of all costs charged for withdrawals per cryptocurrency. However, charges are not demanded for all digital payment methods.

The prices are requested in the currency that is traded. The transactions are also charged with a fee. The expenses are always calculated for one month. They are based on the total trading volume. However, users should keep in mind one peculiarity: the higher the traded volume, the lower the fee. The percentage amount is usually between 0.2 and 0.0 percent of the traded amount. However, the costs are much higher in percentage terms for a margin investment. These can amount to up to 20 percent of the traded sum.

The broker obviously wanted to prevent clients from using the platform as a private wallet. Therefore, an inactivity fee was introduced. There is little to be found about the amount of this fee. However, users must give their consent to the collection of these costs during registration.

The fees distinguish between two transactions:

• EMaker fee
• ZTaker fee

Traders who dispute a high trading volume can reduce their maker fee to zero percent in some cases. But what do the two different fees mean?

Maker fee

The maker fee is due when an order is placed. This is immediately recorded in the order book.

Taker fee

Anyone who wants to buy coins on the platform must pay a taker fee. The position is liquidated in the order book after the transaction. Subsequently, it will be taken out.

Quantum AI Review: How good is the customer service?

If you have any questions or problems, the first thing to do is to read the FAQ on the website. If no solution can be found there, it is necessary to contact the customer support. Users can leave a message using the contact form on the company’s website. The answer will be provided within a short time. Moreover, Quantum AI crypto exchange employees can be reached via social networks. After logging into Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn, a message can be sent via the messaging system of the respective application. The website is available in three languages. Besides English, Chinese as well as Russian can be selected.

Stijgende financieringsrente voor Bitcoin-futures

Stijgende financieringsrente voor Bitcoin-futures geeft aan dat handelaren $50.000 BTC verwachten

Kopers van Bitcoin perpetual futures betalen wekelijks 5,4% om hun posities open te houden, maar is dit houdbaar?

Vandaag schoot de Bitcoin (BTC) prijs omhoog naar een nieuwe all-time high op $44.900 kort nadat Tesla een Bitcoin Code investering van $1,5 miljard aankondigde. Deze gebeurtenis zorgde ervoor dat er in twee uur tijd voor $555 miljoen aan shorts werd geliquideerd en dit gebeurde terwijl de open rente op Bitcoin futures $13,7 miljard bereikte, wat slechts 3% onder het historische hoogtepunt is.

Deze prijsbewegingen verhoogden drastisch de kosten van het aanhouden van long posities, vooral voor diegenen die gebruik maken van perpetuele futures. Deze indicator wees op een gele vlag over hoe leveraged deze investeerders zijn en hun potentiële prijsimpact.

Zoals u kunt zien, heeft de totale BTC futures open interest zojuist een all-time high van $15 miljard bereikt.

Wanneer onverwacht positief nieuws de markt bereikt, is het natuurlijk voor spelers om extreme hefboomposities in te nemen. Dit gebeurt zowel bij short sellers, wiens marges kleiner worden door verliezen, als bij long kopers die hun posities uitbreiden.

Shorts met onvoldoende marge worden geliquideerd omdat hun posities gedwongen worden beëindigd en hun hefboom afneemt. Aan de andere kant profiteren de longs, dus het verhogen van de positie verhoogt hun hefboom niet zo veel.

Na de initiële pomp wordt verwacht dat de financieringsratio stijgt en de vergoedingen die longs betalen om hun perpetuele futures (inverse swaps) open te houden, stijgen.

Zoals hierboven afgebeeld, heeft de 8-uurs vergoeding die wordt aangerekend om de eventuele onevenwichtige hefboom tussen longs en shorts te compenseren, net de 0,25% bereikt. Dit tarief komt overeen met 5,4% per week, wat behoorlijk significant is voor de houders ervan.

Opgemerkt moet worden dat zelfs als Bitcoin in waarde blijft stijgen, zoals te zien was op 29 januari, de financieringsratio de neiging heeft zichzelf aan te passen. Twee belangrijke redenen liggen hieraan ten grondslag: kopers met een hefboom zetten meer geld in en arbitragedesks shorten de perpetuele futures terwijl ze tegelijkertijd spot BTC kopen.

Een dekkingsgraad variërend van 0.05% tot 0.10% per 8 uur is standaard en wordt verwacht tijdens een bull markt. Deze indicator zou een maandelijkse vergoeding van 4,6% tot 9,4% betekenen en zou niet problematisch zijn voor leveraged longs.

Om te begrijpen hoe whales en arbitragedesks zich tijdens deze periode gepositioneerd kunnen hebben, is het nuttig om de long-to-short ratio van de tophandelaren op de belangrijkste beurzen van dichterbij te bekijken.

OKEx-handelaren kochten vooruit op de pomp

Binance tophandelaren hielden een 33% netto long positie ten gunste van longs voorafgaand aan de rally van 8 februari, en dit is iets boven hun 26% 2-weeks gemiddelde. Zodra het Tesla nieuws in de pers kwam, verhoogden ze hun longs en duwden de indicator naar 46%, wat het hoogste niveau is in bijna een maand.

Huobi tophandelaren, aan de andere kant, bleven relatief onaangetast door het nieuws. Hun netto positie stond op 0.74, wat betekent dat 26% een voorkeur had voor short op 8 februari. Hun huidige 28% netto short positie blijft in lijn met het vorige 2-weeks gemiddelde.

Tot slot verhoogden OKEx tophandelaren hun netto longs vanaf 6 februari tot de vroege uren van 8 februari, waarbij ze een netto long positie bereikten van 14%. Op de een of andere manier de rally correct voorspellend, verminderden deze traders agressief hun netto longs toen BTC zijn all-time high bereikte.

De huidige forse financieringsratio kan een ongemak zijn voor longs, maar momenteel is er geen teken van excessieve hefboomwerking door kopers. Tenminste voor de grote market makers en arbitrage desks die de top traders van de meeste beurzen uitmaken.

Bitcoin and data security on the blockchain

Bitcoin and data security on the blockchain

What is the level of security of the data recorded on Bitcoin’s blockchain?

First of all, it must be said that, from a technical point of view, Bitcoin’s blockchain is nothing more than a public file, about 376 GB in size, of which there are tens of thousands of identical copies scattered around the world.

It is therefore not a single file held by a Bitcoin Fortune single manager who has the power to alter it or who can be hacked with a single attack, but it is tens of thousands of identical copies that are effectively unhackable.

In other words, it is impossible for someone to hack all the machines on which a copy is stored, in order to alter all of them.

To be honest, it might be enough to modify most of them to alter their content, but even that seems implausible.

Also because, if someone were able to alter many of them, there would still be a few unaltered ones left to use for comparisons, since some of the machines on which a copy is stored are practically unhackable.

This is very important because the protocol with which this file is built requires that anyone can check its correctness, given that the file is public and not encrypted.

In essence, it would be impossible to pass off an altered blockchain as good.

If someone managed to alter a few copies of the Bitcoin blockchain, the alteration would immediately come to light, and the existence of a few unaltered copies would make it easy to compare them and verify without a shadow of a doubt which is the altered one and which is the original.

In reality, it would also be possible to make an altered copy of the blockchain without it violating the protocol, but it would be so expensive that very few could afford to do so.

Also, the older the blocks, the harder it would be to reconstruct them to conform to the protocol, so at most realistically one could create a blockchain where only the last few blocks are altered.

Security on Bitcoin

As can be seen from this reasoning, attempting to alter the Bitcoin blockchain is not worthwhile because it would be extremely difficult and expensive to do so, and it would be virtually impossible for anyone to notice.

A different matter, however, applies to new blocks, i.e. those that are added to the blockchain every 10 minutes or so. In this case, it would be possible to launch a 51% attack, to force the validator nodes to add new, altered blocks.

However, even in this case the cost would be considerable, and it would be practically impossible to do this without anyone noticing. So it is simply not worth doing.

In light of this, it is possible to say that it is virtually impossible to change the data once it has been recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain, where it therefore enjoys a very high degree of security.

It is still public data that can be seen in the clear by everyone, but if it is a cryptographic hash for example, even if it is read by anyone, it does not cause problems.